FBI Whitepaper

Cost of Public Corruption

Dallas Police & Fire Pension - System trustees have a fiduciary duty to provide pension and related benefits to its members. System trustees also have a duty to ensure affordability to our first responders, the City of Dallas and its taxpayers. Contrary to media reports, legislation passed during 2017 while favorable did not fix the pension fund and all remains at risk.

The System’s cost of corruption can be readily determined by reviewing System financial statements and include monies paid from the pension system fund for an army of consultants to include law firms, accounting firms, actuarial consulting firms, investment management firms, turnaround management firms, the cost to lobby, the cost to mediate, the cost to recruit and train and the list goes on.

On the other hand, the City of Dallas, embedded within an economically viable area commonly referred to as the DFW Metroplex, is financially challenged by changing work force demographics, an aging infrastructure in need of repair, and economic and social costs of corruption directly attributed to the Dallas Police & Fire Pension fund debacle to include but not limited to the following:

  1. Credit Rating – City of Dallas officials anticipate seeking voter approval this fall for a $1 billion plus bond issuance with a cost-to-carry anticipated in the eight to ten point range, or about twice the cost had recent credit downgrades citing concerns regarding the pension fund not occurred. Also impacted by credit rating downgrades are current holders of City of Dallas debt, and possible insolvency issues perceived by institutional investors.

  2. Public Safety – City of Dallas first responder resignations and retirements have been substantial citing concerns regarding the pension fund, and are anticipated to continue for the foreseeable future. There has been a cost of corruption impact on first responder morale, retention and recruiting that could if unabated impact public perception adversely influencing those wanting to move to Dallas and those willing to remain.

  3. Economic Development – City of Dallas economic development incentives needed to retain and attract new business are destined to increase. A cascading effect for sure, the cost of corruption magnifies crime and public safety concerns, and directly impacts the City’s credit rating making the cost to borrow both unaffordable and less likely to resolve changing work force and aging infrastructure issues.

  4. Deferred Retirement Option Plan – DROP monies held on account by the pension fund must be retained (pursuant to new legislation) for the System to remain financially viable. Members wanting access to their DROP monies sooner rather than later are most certain to raise legal challenges re the conversion of member accounts (by legislative mandate) to member annuities. An adverse court ruling would most certainly result in plan insolvency and possible plan termination.


Columbus A. Alexander, III, CPA
Certified Fraud Examiner

September 1, 2017